A laboratory investigation on the performance of South African acid producing gold mine tailings and its possible use in mine reclamation.

This paper presents the results of laboratory investigations conducted on gold mine tailings (GMT) to assess their chemical, mineralogical and geotechnical characteristics in view of assessing its suitability as an alternative backfilling solution in mine reclamation. Chemical characterization revealed that GMT is dominated by Si, Al, and Fe with notable amounts of Cr, Zr, Zn, Pb, Ce, As, Ba, Ni, V, Sr, Nd, Cu, U, and Co. Mineralogical characterization revealed a composition of silicate minerals with secondary minerals such as jarosite, goethite and hematite. GMT composites showed improved strength characteristics. The particle sizes of the tailings are capable of producing a good paste fill that will require lower water-cement ratio. Moreover, the plasticity of the tailings provide for a likelihood for shear resistance to sliding in fluvial conditions. Curing and addition of cement showed positive effects on the compressive strength and shear strength of the tailings. However, the effect of curing and cement addition on the compaction characteristics and permeability of the tailings were negligible. GMT showed favorable characteristics for use in mine backfilling; it would be interesting to evaluate higher cement ratios to improve the characteristics of the tailings.

Acid mine drainage neutralization in a pilot sequencing batch reactor using limestone from a paper and pulp industry.

This study investigated the implications of using two grades of limestone from a paper and pulp industry for neutralization of acid mine drainage (AMD) in a pilot sequencing batch reactor (SBR). In this regard, two grades of calcium carbonate were used to neutralize AMD in a SBR with a hydraulic retention time (including settling) of 100 min and a sludge retention time of 360 min, by simultaneously monitoring the Fe(II) removal kinetics and overall assessment of the AMD after treatment. The Fe(II) kinetics removal and overall AMD treatment were observed to be highly dependent on the limestone grade used, with Fe(II) completely removed to levels lower than 50 mg/L in cycle 1 after 30 min using high quality or pure paper and pulp limestone. On the contrary, the other grade limestone, namely waste limestone, could only achieve a similar Fe(II) removal efficiency after four cycles. It was also noticed that suspended solids concentration plays a significant role in Fe(II) removal kinetics. In this regard, using pure limestone from the paper and pulp industry will have advantages compared with waste limestone for AMD neutralization. It has significant process impacts for the SBR configuration as it allows one cycle treatment resulting in a significant reduction of the feed stock, with subsequent generation of less sludge during AMD neutralization. However, the use of waste calcium carbonate from the paper and pulp industry as a feed stock during AMD neutralization can achieve significant cost savings as it is cheaper than the pure limestone and can achieve the same removal efficiency after four cycles.

Fe(II) oxidation during acid mine drainage neutralization in a pilot-scale Sequencing Batch Reactor.

This study investigated Fe(II) oxidation during acid mine drainage (AMD) neutralization using CaCO3 in a pilot-scale Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) of hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 90 min and sludge retention time (SRT) of 360 min in the presence of air. The removal kinetics of Fe(II), of initial concentration 1,033 ± 0 mg/L, from AMD through oxidation to Fe(III) was observed to depend on both pH and suspended solids, resulting in Fe(II) levels of 679 ± 32, 242 ± 64, 46 ± 16 and 28 ± 0 mg/L recorded after cycles 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively, with complete Fe(II) oxidation only achieved after complete neutralization of AMD. Generally, it takes 30 min to completely oxidize Fe(II) during cycle 4, suggesting that further optimization of SBR operation based on both pH and suspended solids manipulation can result in significant reduction of the number of cycles required to achieve acceptable Fe(II) oxidation for removal as ferric hydroxide. Overall, complete removal of Fe(II) during AMD neutralization is attractive as it promotes recovery of better quality waste gypsum, key to downstream gypsum beneficiation for recovery of valuables, thereby enabling some treatment-cost recovery and prevention of environmental pollution from dumping of sludge into landfills.